B4) Genetic assessment of diversity
Genetic assessment of insect diversity and functional connectivity among forest patches across the landscape
Gernot Segelbacher
Doctoral researchers: Nathalie Winiger (since 2016), Laura-Sophia Ruppert (since 2019)
& Mohammad Jamil Shuvo (seit 2022)
University of Freiburg, Faculty of Environment & Natural Resources, Institute of Forest Sciences,
Chair of Wildlife Ecology and Management
Background
There is growing evidence that insects are not only declining in grasslands, but also in forest ecosystems, driven by large scale effects, such as the increasing fragmentation of suitable habitat. In Central European forests existing management practices have been focusing on retention of dead wood and habitat trees, which provide habitat for saproxylic species including several that are endangered.
However, it remains unclear if this kind of management is helping to maintain species richness and genetic connectivity across forest landscapes Within that context we here focus on estimating species richness with molecular methods (metabarcoding) and identifying connectivity levels through genomics
Research questions and hypotheses
Here, we investigate arthropod diversity on our research plots in correlation to habitat type, retention forestry elements (such as dead wood abundance and forest heterogeneity) and connectivity of the surrounding landscape. We test how insect diversity on local plots is (i) affected by the amount of available dead wood and habitat trees on the plot level and (ii) by the surrounding matrix. We hypothesize that:
- Insect diversity estimates are depending on the local habitat diversity and affected by the available amount of dead wood and habitat trees.
- Species richness is affected by the surrounding landscape matrix and the intensity of forest management.
- Gene flow among patches is not only a function of distance among patches but also the composition of the surrounding landscape.
Approach, methods and linkages
Two different species assemblages (samples through insect traps and leaf-litter) have been collected previously and can now be further analysed. Additionally, we will now characterize TreMs invertebrate diversity through metabarcoding.
Selected species will be full genome sequenced for low coverage. Genomic data will be correlated with habitat and landscape data. The landscape matrix characteristics (tree species composition, height, horizontal and vertical structuring) have already be obtained by aerial photographs and the amount of coarse woody debris between patches is quantified by a combination of terrestrial mapping and remote sensing.
A final landscape genomics modeling approach combining both genomic and environmental variables will allow us to identify connectivity pathways across the landscape. B4 is directly linked with B3 on sampling and analysing arthropod communities. Additionally, B4 is linked to A1 and A2 in making use of their data, mainly plot and landscape forest characteristics and with B1, B2, B5 and B6 in exchanging and combining data of the project specific taxa.
Findings
During the first three years, B4 started developing protocols for estimating deadwood beetle occurrence in deadwood through eDNA sampling of wood and for sampling eDNA from tree cavity mould to identify tree microhabitat inhabiting species. Several protocols have been developed to optimise sampling for flight intersection traps as well as dead wood and leaf letter when data should be used for metabarcoding.
In combination with B3, flight interception traps have been set up to determine arthropod diversity and identify key target species for the genetic connectivity studies. Based on this, eight beetle species were chosen for RAD sequencing and are now fully analysed to estimate gene flow between populations.
We are currently investigating ground-dwelling arthropod communities in relation to habitat quality parameters like dead wood abundance/type, vegetation, soil chemistry and structural parameters like forest heterogeneity and connectivity. For this we have collect several leaf-litter sifts along a transect of each plot and processed them as bulk samples in a metabarcoding pipeline to estimate arthropod species richness.
We also have identified additional species for full genome sequencing which will allow us to estimate genetic diversity across the landscape and measure intraspecific genetic distances in addition to calling SNPs from RADseq data.
ConFoBi-publications by B4
Hendel, Anna-Lena; Winiger, Nathalie; Jonker, Marlotte; Zielewska-Büttner, Katarzyna; Ganz, Selina & Adler, Petra et al. (2023). Bat habitat selection reveals positive effects of retention forestry. Forest Ecology and Management, 531, 12. URL https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S037811272300016610.1016/j.foreco.2023.120783.
Knuff, Anna K.; Winiger, Nathalie; Klein, Alexandra‐Maria; Segelbacher, Gernot & Staab, Michael (2019). Optimizing sampling of flying insects using a modified window trap. Methods Ecol Evol, 10, 1820–1825. URL https://doi.org/10.1111/2041-210X.13258
Rappa, Nolan J.; Staab, Michael; Frey, Julian; Winiger, Nathalie & Klein, Alexandra-Maria (2022). Multiple forest structural elements are needed to promote beetle biomass, diversity and abundance. Forest Ecosystems, 9, 11. URL https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S219756202200056210.1016/j.fecs.2022.100056.
Rappa, Nolan J.; Staab, Michael; Ruppert, Laura-Sophia; Frey, Julian; Bauhus, Jürgen & Klein, Alexandra-Maria (2023). Structural elements enhanced by retention forestry promote forest and non-forest specialist bees and wasps. Forest Ecology and Management, 529, 11. URL https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S037811272200703410.1016/j.foreco.2022.120709.
Ruppert, Laura-Sophia; Segelbacher, Gernot; Staab, Michael & Winiger, Nathalie (2023). Gauging DNA degradation among common insect trap preservatives. Entomologia Experimentalis et Applicata, n/a, 9. URL 10.1111/eea.13266.
Winiger, Nathalie; Seibold, Sebastian; Lucek, Kay; Müller, Jörg & Segelbacher, Gernot (2022). Lost in dead wood? Environmental DNA sequencing from dead wood shows little signs of saproxylic beetles. Environmental DNA, 4, 654–660. URL https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/edn3.28410.1002/edn3.284.